View Single Post
Old 08.10.2010, 06:06 PM   #375
knox
invito al cielo
 
knox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,255
knox kicks all y'all's assesknox kicks all y'all's assesknox kicks all y'all's assesknox kicks all y'all's assesknox kicks all y'all's assesknox kicks all y'all's assesknox kicks all y'all's assesknox kicks all y'all's assesknox kicks all y'all's assesknox kicks all y'all's assesknox kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by FreshChops
Criminals like owning a firearm for the feeling of "power".

All others like owning a firearm for a sense of "self defense"

what would the ratios look like for number of firearms owned responsibly and without incident vs. firearms used for murder?

I insist, just because YOU can not operate a firearm, doesn't make it illogical for others to own them. You're forcing your will, limited by your own insecurities onto others... lame.

it's been said a million times before, MOST victims are murdered by someone they know/love/trust. Since they are not expecting it, having a gun doesn't help much.

it's been said a million times, more guns = more murders, in terms of stats. Also in terms on stats, people's chances of getting hurt/killed in the event of crime increased when they own a gun and attempt to use it.

it's been said a million times before, ONE owning a gun puts OTHERS at risk potentially, so the whole forcing your will thing cannot apply there logically speaking.

it's been said a million times before, MOST crimes happen with guns once purchased legally.

So you may continue the discussion, as long as you aknowledge those simple facts.
__________________
 
knox is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|