View Single Post
Old 07.23.2015, 07:36 PM   #7173
demonrail666
invito al cielo
 
demonrail666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 18,510
demonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuchFriendsAreDangerous
Yes, im glad you are engaging in a conversation. Identity is an "American" sports thing, i used ito describe an American team

It's not an American thing at all. Lots of football teams have an identity if they're identified with a specific kind of play or a general attitude. There's actually a debate in England going on right now about whether the English team has lost its sense of identity. We used to be known for a very fast, direct, hard style that's been sidelined in recent years as we've tried to adapt to a more sophisticated 'continental' style of play. It's why someone like John Terry is described as a 'classic' English Centre Back. I definitely think the US had an identity under Bradley. They were very well organised, if a bit one-dimensional, probably to compensate for their lack of individual flair players. They were (and to a degree still are) seen as being very fair (ie no diving, etc) and sometimes thought of as being a bit naive as a result. An identity can refer to tactics but also to attitude. Costa Rica are getting a reputation for being really dirty so that becomes part of their identity. Mourinho teams are identified with taking everything to the limit, Fergie's Man U were identified by their never-say-die spirit. Some people might choose to use a different word but they're ultimately talking about the same thing.
demonrail666 is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|