Quote:
|
Originally Posted by !@#$%!
if you put those comments right in the very context you describe you'll see that he's playing with matches next to a gasoline barrel. same with his claims that the election is rigged. so yes, if you look at each word in isolation it can mean a lot of things, but in context--no seņor. in context he's teasing the death cock of hate and getting it hard. the fucker is an irresponsible madman unfit to be a small town mayor much less president of the USA.
|
agreed
Quote:
and OF COURSE the democrats are going to milk that for all it's worth. that doesn't invalidate the stupid blunder. a politician's #1 job is to control their fucking piehole.
|
yes indeed I said this months ago, however I think the 2nd Amendment thing is ridiculous. Dragging Dr King's daughter into it was especially rich. It just fits into the prototypical stereotypes of "liberals" and frankly I think makes a lot of the Democrats look petty and self absorbed like I said above.
Point blank. I personally think the more mature way for the Democrats to have handled this was to say something like, "Well sure the 2nd Amendment comments might have been about voting, but what about all the other insinuations and outright calls for violence?"
See how that works? It offers something of an olive branch while more strictly focusing the issue on raising awareness about the overall vile rhetoric coming out of the Republicans for YEARS now. If we are all going to waste our time on the 2nd Amendment comments we miss the opportunity to discuss all the much worse things said.