View Single Post
Old 01.10.2008, 01:35 AM   #109
flophousefloozie
expwy. to yr skull
 
flophousefloozie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Cowtown, Canada
Posts: 1,694
flophousefloozie kicks all y'all's assesflophousefloozie kicks all y'all's assesflophousefloozie kicks all y'all's assesflophousefloozie kicks all y'all's assesflophousefloozie kicks all y'all's assesflophousefloozie kicks all y'all's assesflophousefloozie kicks all y'all's assesflophousefloozie kicks all y'all's assesflophousefloozie kicks all y'all's assesflophousefloozie kicks all y'all's assesflophousefloozie kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by girlgun
again this is true, but -for example- how many women aren't hired for a job because they're too thin vs. too fat?

there was a comment made about women on magazine covers being criticized because they're too thin... well there certainly aren't any fat women on the covers to begin with.

see what i'm saying?

making comments are shitty and people are made different. they just are. people should be proud and accept who they are, but when it comes down to true discrimination... fat people take the brunt.

I don't know if this is true anymore.
Tasteful often magazines have women who are possibly overweight on their covers, but not for the purpose of displaying how attractive they are.

Such magazines would rarely display an image of someone of might be underweight, because they are trying to emphasize the fact that being underweight is unattractive. But being over is just fine.
flophousefloozie is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|