Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Confucious is sex
Who, exactly, do you think that the country was stolen from, given that at the time the 'theft' I presume you are referring to took place - 1948 - there were Jews and Palestinians living there? If one wishes to be accurate with one's condemnation of the people who we now know as Israelis, they took full possession of a land that was only 50% theirs; not theft, so much as bad tenancy.
Finally, to those who wish to employ the argument that the Palestinians are not properly/equally armed, I offer the following: they were armed by Israel in order that they would be able to defend themselves; they are not a united nation and, therefore, have not been able to form a military; molatov cocktails are a much crueller attack on an individual than a bullet wound. Think on these...
|
"Bad tenancy". Ha. You are employing the technique of tyrants and murderers everywhere, twisting words to mask the reality of what is going on. Use plain English to describe what is going on, not an elaborate series of euphemisms.
Also, I have no idea what your incoherent mumblings in your second paragraph are alluding to. Are you suggesting that because Molotov cocktails are thrown at the vehicles of an occupying force that the saturation bombing of urban areas is somehow justified? And what do you mean "they were armed by Israel".